Existing deep learning real denoising methods require a large amount of noisyclean image pairs for supervision. Nonetheless, capturing a real noisy-clean dataset is an unacceptable expensive and cumbersome procedure. To alleviate this problem, this work investigates how to generate realistic noisy images. Firstly, we formulate a simple yet reasonable noise model that treats each real noisy pixel as a random variable. This model splits the noisy image generation problem into two subproblems: image domain alignment and noise domain alignment.

This project explores the integration of Bayesian Optimization (BO) algorithms into a base machine learning model, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), for classifying gravitational waves among background noise. The primary objective is to evaluate whether optimizing hyperparameters using Bayesian Optimization enhances the base model's performance. For this purpose, a Kaggle [1] dataset that comprises real background noise (labeled 0) and simulated gravitational wave signals with noise (labeled 1) is used. Data with real noise is collected from three detectors: LIGO Livingston, LIGO Hanford, and Virgo. Through data preprocessing and training, the models effectively classify testing data, predicting the presence of gravitational wave signals with a remarkable score, of 83.61%. The BO model demonstrates comparable accuracy to the base model, but its performance improvement is not very significant (84.34%). However, it is worth noting that the BO model needs additional computational resources and time due to the iterations required for hyperparameter optimization, requiring additional training on the entire dataset. For this reason, the BO model is less efficient in terms of resources compared to the base model in gravitational wave classification

Available training data for named entity recognition (NER) often contains a significant percentage of incorrect labels for entity types and entity boundaries. Such label noise poses challenges for supervised learning and may significantly deteriorate model quality. To address this, prior work proposed various noise-robust learning approaches capable of learning from data with partially incorrect labels. These approaches are typically evaluated using simulated noise where the labels in a clean dataset are automatically corrupted. However, as we show in this paper, this leads to unrealistic noise that is far easier to handle than real noise caused by human error or semi-automatic annotation. To enable the study of the impact of various types of real noise, we introduce NoiseBench, an NER benchmark consisting of clean training data corrupted with 6 types of real noise, including expert errors, crowdsourcing errors, automatic annotation errors and LLM errors. We present an analysis that shows that real noise is significantly more challenging than simulated noise, and show that current state-of-the-art models for noise-robust learning fall far short of their theoretically achievable upper bound. We release NoiseBench to the research community.